Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Canon
86 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm GF80mmF1.7 R WR 35-63mm

Fujifilm GF80mmF1.7 R WR 35-63mm

Fujifilm
48 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

82 out of 100 high confidence 331 reviews

The Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM lens is widely praised for its excellent sharpness, fast and silent autofocus, and lightweight design, making it a fantastic value for amateur photographers and wildlife enthusiasts. Many users highlight the impressive image quality at the long end and the effective image stabilization, though some note softness beyond 200mm and noticeable vignetting at full zoom. A few reviewers experienced quality control issues like blurry images or a non-functional focus ring, but the overwhelming consensus is that this lens delivers outstanding performance for its price point.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness for the price
  • Fast and silent STM autofocus
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Effective image stabilization
  • Great value for money
Cons
  • Softness beyond 200mm
  • Noticeable vignetting at full zoom
  • Plastic build quality
  • Electronic manual focus requires camera power
  • Slow maximum aperture (f/5.6 at 250mm)
👍 Image quality 45
👍 Autofocus performance 30
👍 Value for money 35
🤔 Build quality 20
👍 Image stabilization 18
🤔 Sharpness at long end 25

Fujifilm GF80mmF1.7 R WR 35-63mm

88 out of 100 medium confidence 10 reviews

Owners of the Fujifilm GF 80mm lens are overwhelmingly positive, praising its exceptional sharpness, beautiful rendering, and creamy bokeh. Many consider it a must-have for portrait work on GFX cameras, despite noting a somewhat noisy autofocus motor. The lens is described as a favorite even among users of other high-end systems like Leica and Hasselblad.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness
  • Beautiful rendering
  • Creamy bokeh
  • Great for portraits
  • Lightweight
Cons
  • Noisy autofocus motor
  • Minor chromatic aberration
👍 Sharpness 4
👍 Bokeh 3
👍 Rendering 3
👎 Autofocus noise 2
👍 Portrait use 3
👍 Build quality 2

Scores

Budget
Canon
90
Fujifilm
43
Travel
Canon
85
Fujifilm
37
Street
Canon
81
Fujifilm
41
Portrait
Canon
80
Fujifilm
39
Wildlife Sports
Canon
78
Fujifilm
40
Video Cinema
Canon
77
Fujifilm
48
Landscape
Canon
74
Fujifilm
45
Professional
Canon
68
Fujifilm
49
Macro
Canon
62
Fujifilm
38

Specifications

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STMFujifilm GF80mmF1.7 R WR 35-63mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min55 mm80 mm
Focal Length Max250 mm80 mm
Elements1512
Groups129
Aspherical Elements01★
ED Elements12★
CoatingSuper Spectra coatingFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/22
Min Aperture4-5.6f/1.7
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountCanon EF-SFujifilm G
FormatAPS-C★medium-format
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.38 kg★0.80 kg
Filter Thread58 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★Automatic
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance850 mm700 mm★
Max Magnification0.29x★0.15x

Pros & Cons

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average macro (31st percentile)

Fujifilm GF80mmF1.7 R WR 35-63mm

  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong optical (71st percentile)
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (25th percentile)
  • Below average macro (28th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Scores 86 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports