Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Overall Score
vs
Canon L EF 135mm f/2L USM 135mm
Canon
74 Overall Score
Scores
Video Cinema
Portrait
Budget
Street
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Macro
Landscape
Travel
Specifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Canon L EF 135mm f/2L USM 135mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 135 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 135 mm |
| Elements | — | 10 |
| Groups | — | 8 |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | — | Super Spectra coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/2 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/2 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Canon EF |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weight | — | 0.89 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 72 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | USM★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 914 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.19x★ |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Canon L EF 135mm f/2L USM 135mm
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong aperture (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Below average build (23rd percentile)
- Below average macro (30th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Verdict
Winner: Canon L EF 135mm f/2L USM 135mm
Scores 74 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 18 specs.