Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Canon L EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM

Canon L EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM

Canon
66 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

92 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent low-light performance. Users love its versatility for travel, video, and long exposures, often pairing it with other lenses in the budget trinity. A few note it's not as premium as the S-line or Nikon 14-30mm, but most agree it offers incredible value for the price.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great value for money
  • Versatile for travel and video
Cons
  • Not as premium as S-line lenses
  • Some prefer wider 14-30mm range
  • Build not as exceptional as premium trinity
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Low light performance 4
👍 Size and weight 5
👍 Versatility 5

Canon L EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM

88 out of 100 high confidence 135 reviews

The Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM lens is widely praised for its exceptional sharpness, fast autofocus, and robust build quality. Users highlight its versatility for wildlife, sports, and even close-up photography, with many noting it outperforms competitors like the Sigma and Tamron 150-600mm lenses in image quality. However, some criticize the price increase and occasional sharpness inconsistencies, while a few users report autofocus limitations with extenders on certain camera bodies.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Versatile zoom range (100-400mm)
  • Excellent image stabilization
  • Robust build quality
Cons
  • Price increase over time
  • Heavy weight
  • Autofocus limitations with 2x extender
  • Some copies lack sharpness
  • Not ideal for Sony mirrorless
👍 Image quality 45
👍 Autofocus performance 30
👍 Build quality 25
👍 Versatility 20
👍 Image stabilization 15
🤔 Price value 12

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Canon
55
Budget
Nikon
85
Canon
72
Street
Nikon
84
Canon
52
Macro
Nikon
84
Canon
62
Portrait
Nikon
84
Canon
36
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Canon
54
Landscape
Nikon
79
Canon
73
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Canon
72
Travel
Nikon
70
Canon
63

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Canon L EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min17 mm100 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm400 mm
Elements1321
Groups1116
Aspherical Elements34★
ED Elements3★1
CoatingMulti-CoatedAir Sphere Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/100
Min Aperturef/2.84.5-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.45 kg★1.64 kg
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorUSM★
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★980 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26★0.31x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Canon L EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM

  • Strong optical (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average aperture (1st percentile)1st %ile
  • Below average bokeh (1st percentile)1st %ile
  • Below average build (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average macro (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo Cinema