Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Brightin Star AF 35mm f/1.7 35mm

Brightin Star AF 35mm f/1.7 35mm

Brightin Star
61 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
Brightin Star
52
Portrait
Nikon
89
Brightin Star
48
Street
Nikon
86
Brightin Star
55
Budget
Nikon
86
Brightin Star
48
Macro
Nikon
85
Brightin Star
58
Landscape
Nikon
83
Brightin Star
58
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Brightin Star
45
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Brightin Star
42
Travel
Nikon
75
Brightin Star
57

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Brightin Star AF 35mm f/1.7 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm35 mm
Elements1311
Groups118
Aspherical Elements32
ED Elements31
CoatingMulti-Coatedmulti-layer coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/16
Constant
Diaphragm Blades911
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.22 kg
Filter Thread67 mm62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motormanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm400 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Brightin Star AF 35mm f/1.7 35mm

  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (70th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports