Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM

Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM

Canon
87 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent low-light performance. Users love its versatility for travel, video, and long exposures, often pairing it with other lenses in the budget trinity. A few note it's not as premium as the S-line or Nikon 14-30mm, but most agree it offers incredible value for the price.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great value for money
  • Versatile for travel and video
Cons
  • Not as premium as S-line lenses
  • Some prefer wider 14-30mm range
  • Build not as exceptional as premium trinity
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Low light performance 4
👍 Size and weight 5
👍 Versatility 5

Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM

82 out of 100 high confidence 331 reviews

The Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM lens is widely praised for its excellent sharpness, fast and silent autofocus, and lightweight design, making it a fantastic value for amateur photographers and wildlife enthusiasts. Many users highlight the impressive image quality at the long end and the effective image stabilization, though some note softness beyond 200mm and noticeable vignetting at full zoom. A few reviewers experienced quality control issues like blurry images or a non-functional focus ring, but the overwhelming consensus is that this lens delivers outstanding performance for its price point.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness for the price
  • Fast and silent STM autofocus
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Effective image stabilization
  • Great value for money
Cons
  • Softness beyond 200mm
  • Noticeable vignetting at full zoom
  • Plastic build quality
  • Electronic manual focus requires camera power
  • Slow maximum aperture (f/5.6 at 250mm)
👍 Image quality 45
👍 Autofocus performance 30
👍 Value for money 35
🤔 Build quality 20
👍 Image stabilization 18
🤔 Sharpness at long end 25

Scores

Budget
Nikon
84
Canon
94
Professional
Nikon
89
Canon
69
Portrait
Nikon
87
Canon
78
Macro
Nikon
84
Canon
68
Street
Nikon
83
Canon
80
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Canon
78
Landscape
Nikon
82
Canon
74
Travel
Nikon
70
Canon
74
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
72
Canon
71

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mmCanon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min17 mm55 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm250 mm
Elements1315
Groups1112
Aspherical Elements3★0
ED Elements3★1
CoatingMulti-CoatedSuper Spectra coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/4
Min Aperturef/2.84-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF-S
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight0.45 kg0.38 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorSTM★
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★250 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26★0.29x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile

Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm Better at:

MacroStreetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo Cinema

Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM Better at:

BudgetTravel

Also Consider