Tamron Di II SP AF 10-24mm f / 3.5-4.5

Tamron Di II SP AF 10-24mm f / 3.5-4.5

Tamron
42 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
98 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Tamron
23
Sigma
100
Landscape
Tamron
38
Sigma
100
Budget
Tamron
49
Sigma
99
Travel
Tamron
41
Sigma
93
Video Cinema
Tamron
47
Sigma
90
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
40
Sigma
87
Portrait
Tamron
40
Sigma
85
Professional
Tamron
38
Sigma
84
Street
Tamron
42
Sigma
80

Specifications

Tamron Di II SP AF 10-24mm f / 3.5-4.5Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min10 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max24 mm300 mm
Elements—20
Groups—14
Aspherical Elements—4★
ED Elements—5★
Coating—water- and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/10f/3.5
Min Aperture—3.5-6.7
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
MountCanon EFSony E
Format—APS-C★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.44 kg★0.61 kg
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—HLA
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops—6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance—170 mm★
Max Magnification—1:2★

Pros & Cons

Tamron Di II SP AF 10-24mm f / 3.5-4.5

  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (78th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (77th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports