Zeiss Aatma 40mm T1.5 40mm

Zeiss Aatma 40mm T1.5 40mm

Zeiss
41 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
100 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Zeiss
35
Tamron
97
Macro
Zeiss
41
Tamron
92
Landscape
Zeiss
20
Tamron
87
Wildlife Sports
Zeiss
24
Tamron
85
Professional
Zeiss
28
Tamron
85
Street
Zeiss
29
Tamron
83
Video Cinema
Zeiss
34
Tamron
82
Portrait
Zeiss
31
Tamron
82
Travel
Zeiss
18
Tamron
81

Specifications

Zeiss Aatma 40mm T1.5 40mmTamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min40 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max40 mm300 mm
Elements920
Groups813
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements—2★
Coating—fluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/4
Min Aperturef/1.54-7.1
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades16★9
Build
MountARRI PLSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight1.49 kg0.59 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusVXD linear motor★
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance430 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification—1:3.8★

Pros & Cons

Zeiss Aatma 40mm T1.5 40mm

  • Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average build (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports