Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM 200-800mm

Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM 200-800mm

Canon
39 Overall Score
vs
Sigma 36B965

Sigma 36B965

Sigma
35 Overall Score

Scores

Portrait
Canon
45
Sigma
60
Budget
Canon
50
Sigma
40
Wildlife Sports
Canon
45
Sigma
27
Video Cinema
Canon
43
Sigma
36
Street
Canon
41
Sigma
41
Travel
Canon
35
Sigma
15
Professional
Canon
33
Sigma
30
Landscape
Canon
31
Sigma
14
Macro
Canon
18
Sigma
16

Specifications

Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM 200-800mmSigma 36B965
Optics
Typetelephoto
Focal Length Min200 mm45 mm
Focal Length Max800 mm45 mm
Aperture
Max Aperturef/9f/2.8
Min Aperturef/6.3
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountCanon RFSony E
Weight3.17 kg4.13 kg
Filter Thread55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSMAutofocus
Stabilization

Pros & Cons

Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM 200-800mm

  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average build (0th percentile)0th %ile
  • Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)

Sigma 36B965

  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average build (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Pricing

Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM 200-800mm

Sigma 36B965

No current pricing available

Verdict

Winner: Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM 200-800mm

Scores 39 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 12 specs.

Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM 200-800mm Better at:

MacroBudgetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Sigma 36B965 Better at:

Portrait