Viltrox AF 16/1.8 FE 16mm

Viltrox AF 16/1.8 FE 16mm

Viltrox
62 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon
91 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Viltrox AF 16/1.8 FE 16mm

80 out of 100 high confidence 76 reviews

The Viltrox 16mm f/1.8 lens is widely praised for its excellent image quality, solid build, and outstanding value for money. Many users find it sharp, fast, and versatile for landscapes, astrophotography, and video. However, a few have reported autofocus inconsistencies, occasional bricking after months of use, and some limitations like unchangeable display units and manual-only aperture on certain mounts.

Pros
  • Excellent image sharpness
  • Great value for money
  • Solid metal build quality
  • Fast and quiet autofocus
  • Bright f/1.8 aperture
Cons
  • Autofocus can be unreliable
  • Lens hood does not snap tightly
  • Some copies brick after months
  • Display only shows meters, not feet
  • Aperture control manual only on some mounts
👍 Image quality 25
👍 Value for money 20
👍 Build quality 18
🤔 Autofocus performance 15
👍 Low light performance 10
👎 Lens hood 3

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent low-light performance. Users love its versatility for travel, video, and long exposures, often pairing it with other lenses in the budget trinity. A few note it's not as premium as the S-line or Nikon 14-30mm, but most agree it offers incredible value for the price.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great value for money
  • Versatile for travel and video
Cons
  • Not as premium as S-line lenses
  • Some prefer wider 14-30mm range
  • Build not as exceptional as premium trinity
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Low light performance 4
👍 Size and weight 5
👍 Versatility 5

Scores

Professional
Viltrox
67
Nikon
88
Portrait
Viltrox
47
Nikon
86
Macro
Viltrox
72
Nikon
84
Budget
Viltrox
61
Nikon
84
Street
Viltrox
55
Nikon
82
Video Cinema
Viltrox
58
Nikon
81
Landscape
Viltrox
66
Nikon
78
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
57
Nikon
72
Travel
Viltrox
50
Nikon
70

Specifications

Viltrox AF 16/1.8 FE 16mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm
Optics
Typewide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min16 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max16 mm28 mm
Elements1513
Groups1211
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements4★3
CoatingHD Nano Multilayer CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.55 kg0.45 kg★
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★Stepping Motor
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance270 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification1:101:5.26

Pros & Cons

Viltrox AF 16/1.8 FE 16mm

  • Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong macro (75th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Viltrox AF 16/1.8 FE 16mm0.001score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm0.002score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm offers 2.0x better value for money

Viltrox AF 16/1.8 FE 16mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider