Fujifilm XF 35mm f/1.4 R 35mm

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/1.4 R 35mm

Fujifilm
60 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Fujifilm
58
Nikon
98
Wildlife Sports
Fujifilm
43
Nikon
94
Travel
Fujifilm
50
Nikon
92
Landscape
Fujifilm
43
Nikon
88
Professional
Fujifilm
51
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Fujifilm
52
Nikon
82
Street
Fujifilm
61
Nikon
81
Portrait
Fujifilm
45
Nikon
78
Macro
Fujifilm
46
Nikon
71

Specifications

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/1.4 R 35mmNikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm200 mm
Elements819
Groups615
Aspherical Elements12★
ED Elements2★1
CoatingSuper EBCARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/4
Min Aperturef/1.44-6.3
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountFujifilm XNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.19 kg★0.57 kg
Filter Thread52 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusstepping motor★
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm★500 mm
Max Magnification0.17x0.28x★

Pros & Cons

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/1.4 R 35mm

  • Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average bokeh (28th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports