Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm

Panasonic
88 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VC VXD G2 180mm

Tamron Di III VC 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VC VXD G2 180mm

Tamron
75 Overall Score

Scores

Street
Panasonic
96
Tamron
55
Macro
Panasonic
91
Tamron
78
Professional
Panasonic
90
Tamron
70
Portrait
Panasonic
84
Tamron
47
Video Cinema
Panasonic
83
Tamron
74
Budget
Panasonic
79
Tamron
74
Landscape
Panasonic
64
Tamron
77
Travel
Panasonic
70
Tamron
75
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
74
Tamron
69

Specifications

Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mmTamron Di III VC 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VC VXD G2 180mm
Optics
Typemacrozoom
Focal Length Min100 mm70 mm
Focal Length Max100 mm180 mm
Elements1320
Groups1115
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements34★
Coating—BBAR-G2
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountL-MountSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.30 kg★0.85 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeDual phase linear motor★VXD
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance204 mm★300 mm
Max Magnification1:11:2.6

Pros & Cons

Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Tamron Di III VC 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VC VXD G2 180mm

  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (78th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm

Scores 88 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Tamron Di III VC 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VC VXD G2 180mm Better at:

TravelLandscape