Canon RF 28mm f/2.8 STM 28mm

Canon RF 28mm f/2.8 STM 28mm

Canon
62 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm

Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm

Fujifilm
82 Overall Score

Scores

Street
Canon
62
Fujifilm
91
Professional
Canon
53
Fujifilm
84
Portrait
Canon
38
Fujifilm
82
Video Cinema
Canon
54
Fujifilm
79
Budget
Canon
58
Fujifilm
72
Wildlife Sports
Canon
50
Fujifilm
69
Macro
Canon
48
Fujifilm
68
Travel
Canon
53
Fujifilm
66
Landscape
Canon
51
Fujifilm
57

Specifications

Canon RF 28mm f/2.8 STM 28mmFujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm
Optics
Typewide-angleprime
Focal Length Min28 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm35 mm
Elements89
Groups66
Aspherical Elements3★2
ED Elements—2★
CoatingSuper Spectra CoatingNano-GI coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountCanon RFFujifilm X
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.12 kg★0.13 kg
Filter Thread55 mm43 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★stepping motor
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance231 mm★350 mm
Max Magnification0.17x1:7★

Pros & Cons

Canon RF 28mm f/2.8 STM 28mm

  • Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong aperture (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm

Scores 82 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports