OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3

OM System
61 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

Tamron
100 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3

96 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

This lens receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with users praising its sharpness, fast autofocus, and lightweight design. Many note it as a significant upgrade from previous lenses, especially when paired with teleconverters. The only minor consideration mentioned is the comparison with a Sigma alternative, but the Sony's weight and teleconverter compatibility won out.

Pros
  • Super sharp wide open
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Lightweight design
  • Excellent with teleconverters
  • Great for video and photos
Cons
  • Expensive compared to alternatives
  • Heavier than some competitors
  • No built-in image stabilization
👍 Image quality 6
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👍 Weight and portability 4
👍 Teleconverter compatibility 2
🤔 Value for money 2
👍 Build quality 2

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Tamron 28-300mm super-zoom wins praise for its lightweight design, versatile focal range, and solid image quality. Users appreciate the compact build and smooth zoom mechanism, but note the slow aperture and trade-offs in sharpness compared to more expensive zooms. Verified reviewers find it an ideal travel lens that pairs well with Sony bodies.

Pros
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile 28-300mm focal range
  • Smooth zoom ring operation
  • Compact build for travel
  • Good integration with Sony bodies
Cons
  • Small maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Reduced sharpness vs. premium zooms
  • Not an internal zoom lens
  • Slow autofocus at high fps on some bodies
👍 Build quality 3
🤔 Sharpness 3
👎 Aperture 2
👍 Weight and portability 3
👍 Zoom range 4
👎 Autofocus performance 1

Scores

Macro
OM System
62
Tamron
91
Budget
OM System
52
Tamron
91
Landscape
OM System
67
Tamron
90
Portrait
OM System
37
Tamron
87
Professional
OM System
51
Tamron
84
Wildlife Sports
OM System
50
Tamron
84
Travel
OM System
67
Tamron
84
Street
OM System
49
Tamron
82
Video Cinema
OM System
41
Tamron
80

Specifications

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min12 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm300 mm
Elements1620
Groups1113
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements—2★
CoatingZERO coatingfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/4
Min Aperture3.5-6.34-7.1
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountMicro Four ThirdsSony E
Formatmicro-four-thirdsfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.46 kg★0.59 kg
Filter Thread72 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusVXD linear motor★
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance220 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification1:2.71:2.8

Pros & Cons

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3

  • Strong user sentiment (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong optical (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong macro (79th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (93rd percentile)93rd %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports