Fujinon GF63mmF2.8 R WR 63mm

Fujinon GF63mmF2.8 R WR 63mm

Fujinon
18 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
100 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Fujinon
9
Tamron
97
Macro
Fujinon
37
Tamron
95
Landscape
Fujinon
30
Tamron
87
Wildlife Sports
Fujinon
21
Tamron
85
Professional
Fujinon
29
Tamron
85
Street
Fujinon
19
Tamron
83
Video Cinema
Fujinon
18
Tamron
82
Portrait
Fujinon
10
Tamron
81
Travel
Fujinon
24
Tamron
81

Specifications

Fujinon GF63mmF2.8 R WR 63mmTamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min63 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max63 mm300 mm
Elements1020
Groups813
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements12★
Coatingfluorine coatingfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/32f/4
Min Aperturef/2.84-7.1
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
MountFujifilm GSony E
Formatmedium-formatfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.40 kg★0.59 kg
Filter Thread62 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyVXD linear motor★
Stabilization—✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification—1:3.8★

Pros & Cons

Fujinon GF63mmF2.8 R WR 63mm

  • Strong build (79th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports