Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S.
Panasonic
85 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 887965 16-300mm
Sigma
48 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Budget
Professional
Video Cinema
Landscape
Portrait
Travel
Street
Wildlife Sports
Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S. | Sigma Contemporary 887965 16-300mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | — |
| Focal Length Min | 24 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 105 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | 16 | — |
| Groups | 13 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | — |
| ED Elements | 4★ | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/4 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | L-Mount | — |
| Format | full-frame★ | — |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 1.18 kg | 0.62 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Auto Focus | — |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | — |
| Stabilization Stops | 6 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 300 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 1:2★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S.
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average build (25th percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 887965 16-300mm
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average build (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
Verdict
Winner: Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S.
Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.