Rokinon AF 35-150mm f/2-2.8

Rokinon AF 35-150mm f/2-2.8

Rokinon
59 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Rokinon
60
Nikon
89
Macro
Rokinon
70
Nikon
88
Budget
Rokinon
75
Nikon
85
Street
Rokinon
60
Nikon
84
Portrait
Rokinon
54
Nikon
84
Video Cinema
Rokinon
60
Nikon
82
Landscape
Rokinon
68
Nikon
79
Wildlife Sports
Rokinon
66
Nikon
73
Travel
Rokinon
67
Nikon
70

Specifications

Rokinon AF 35-150mm f/2-2.8Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min35 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max150 mm28 mm
Elements2113
Groups1811
Aspherical Elements23★
ED Elements6★3
CoatingUltra Multi-Coating (UMC)Multi-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperture16-22★f/2.8
Min Aperture2-2.8f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountL-MountNikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight1.31 kg0.45 kg★
Filter Thread82 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typelinear stepping motorStepping Motor
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance330 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification1:5.71:5.26

Pros & Cons

Rokinon AF 35-150mm f/2-2.8

  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong versatility (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (68th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (1st percentile)1st %ile
  • Below average build (21st percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports