Canon L RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM
Canon
64 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
91 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Budget
Street
Macro
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Canon L RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 100 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 23 | 13 |
| Groups | 18 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1 | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 4★ | 3 |
| Coating | ASC, SSC, and Fluorine Coatings | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Nikon Z |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 2.59 kg | 0.45 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 112 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Dual Nano USM★ | Stepping Motor |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 5.5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 1.80 m | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:6.25 | 1:5.26 |
Pros & Cons
Canon L RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM
- Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong versatility (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average build (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 91 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.