Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

Viltrox
71 Overall Score
vs
Rokinon 135M-FX 135mm

Rokinon 135M-FX 135mm

Rokinon
53 Overall Score

Scores

Street
Viltrox
73
Rokinon
44
Portrait
Viltrox
69
Rokinon
70
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
66
Rokinon
31
Budget
Viltrox
66
Rokinon
42
Travel
Viltrox
59
Rokinon
22
Landscape
Viltrox
57
Rokinon
27
Video Cinema
Viltrox
57
Rokinon
40
Macro
Viltrox
56
Rokinon
41
Professional
Viltrox
54
Rokinon
36

Specifications

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mmRokinon 135M-FX 135mm
Optics
Typeprimetelephoto
Focal Length Min56 mm135 mm
Focal Length Max56 mm135 mm
Elements1111
Groups97
ED Elements41
CoatingHD nano-coatingUltra Multi-Coating (UMC)
Aperture
Max Aperture16f/2.0
Min Aperture1.72
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony EFujifilm X
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weight0.17 kg0.88 kg
Filter Thread52 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMmanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance550 mm790 mm
Max Magnification1:9.09

Pros & Cons

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

  • Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (78th percentile)
  • Strong optical (68th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Rokinon 135M-FX 135mm

  • Strong bokeh (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong aperture (91th percentile)91th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91th percentile)91th %ile
  • Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average build (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

Rokinon 135M-FX 135mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

Winner: Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

Scores 71 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 19 specs.

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider