Tokina opera 16-28mm f/2.8 FF 28mm
Tokina
46 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
43 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Budget
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Street
Professional
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Specifications
| Tokina opera 16-28mm f/2.8 FF 28mm | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | — |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | 15 | — |
| Groups | 13 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | — |
| ED Elements | 3★ | — |
| Coating | Multi-Coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | — |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF | — |
| Format | full-frame★ | — |
| Weight | 0.94 kg★ | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | — |
| Stabilization | ✗ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 280 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.26★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Tokina opera 16-28mm f/2.8 FF 28mm
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong macro (75th percentile)
- Strong social proof (70th percentile)
- Strong versatility (69th percentile)
- Below average build (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (32nd percentile)
Verdict
Winner: Tokina opera 16-28mm f/2.8 FF 28mm
Scores 46 overall, wins 3 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 19 specs.