Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon
84 Overall Score
vs
Rokinon AF 50mm f/1.4 50mm

Rokinon AF 50mm f/1.4 50mm

Rokinon
59 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Nikon 16-85mm VR is widely praised as an excellent all-around zoom for DX cameras, delivering sharp images across the focal range with effective VR. Users note it outperforms kit lenses like the 18-105mm and even rivals the pricier 17-55mm in sharpness, though it is heavy and somewhat slow (f/3.5-5.6). Build quality is solid with a metal barrel, and the 16mm wide end is a key advantage for landscapes. Some caution about vignetting with thick filters and barrel distortion at 16mm, but overall it is considered a worthy investment for enthusiasts.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness across focal range
  • Effective VR II image stabilization
  • Solid build with metal barrel
  • Useful 16-85mm zoom range
  • Great for landscapes and travel
Cons
  • Heavy weight (3.1 lb with D90)
  • Slow aperture (f/3.5-5.6)
  • Expensive for an f/3.5-5.6 lens
  • Barrel distortion at 16mm
  • Vignetting with thick filters at 16mm
👍 Image quality 7
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Vibration reduction 5
👎 Weight 4
🤔 Value for money 4
👍 Focal range 4

Rokinon AF 50mm f/1.4 50mm

78 out of 100 high confidence 30 reviews

The Rokinon 50mm f/1.4 lens receives generally positive feedback for its excellent value, sharp optics, and solid build quality, especially for astrophotography and low-light use. However, many users note that the autofocus can be inconsistent and unreliable for fast-moving subjects, and some copies have decentering issues. The lens is fully manual on certain mounts, which is a key consideration for buyers.

Pros
  • Excellent value for money
  • Sharp optics for the price
  • Solid all-metal build quality
  • Great for astrophotography
  • Good low-light performance at f/1.4
Cons
  • Inconsistent autofocus performance
  • Autofocus unreliable for fast-moving subjects
  • Some copies have decentering issues
  • Soft corners at f/1.4
  • Fully manual on certain mounts
👍 Value for money 8
👍 Image quality 12
👍 Build quality 6
👎 Autofocus performance 7
👍 Astrophotography suitability 5
👍 Low light performance 4

Scores

Budget
Nikon
87
Rokinon
60
Portrait
Nikon
79
Rokinon
79
Macro
Nikon
73
Rokinon
60
Street
Nikon
73
Rokinon
63
Video Cinema
Nikon
72
Rokinon
63
Travel
Nikon
69
Rokinon
48
Landscape
Nikon
68
Rokinon
50
Professional
Nikon
64
Rokinon
68
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
61
Rokinon
44

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mmRokinon AF 50mm f/1.4 50mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm50 mm
Focal Length Max85 mm50 mm
Elements—9
Groups—6
Aspherical Elements3★2
ED Elements2★1
CoatingSuper Integrated CoatingUltra Multi-Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/1.4
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/1.4
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades78★
Build
MountNikon FSony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.48 kg0.42 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAF-Smanual focus only
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance380 mm★450 mm
Max Magnification—1:6.25★

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile

Rokinon AF 50mm f/1.4 50mm

  • Strong aperture (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong build (76th percentile)
  • Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (35th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Rokinon AF 50mm f/1.4 50mm Better at:

Professional