Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon
89 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF-S 18-55 f/4-5.6 IS STM 18-55mm

Canon EF-S 18-55 f/4-5.6 IS STM 18-55mm

Canon
85 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Nikon 16-85mm VR is widely praised as an excellent all-around zoom for DX cameras, delivering sharp images across the focal range with effective VR. Users note it outperforms kit lenses like the 18-105mm and even rivals the pricier 17-55mm in sharpness, though it is heavy and somewhat slow (f/3.5-5.6). Build quality is solid with a metal barrel, and the 16mm wide end is a key advantage for landscapes. Some caution about vignetting with thick filters and barrel distortion at 16mm, but overall it is considered a worthy investment for enthusiasts.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness across focal range
  • Effective VR II image stabilization
  • Solid build with metal barrel
  • Useful 16-85mm zoom range
  • Great for landscapes and travel
Cons
  • Heavy weight (3.1 lb with D90)
  • Slow aperture (f/3.5-5.6)
  • Expensive for an f/3.5-5.6 lens
  • Barrel distortion at 16mm
  • Vignetting with thick filters at 16mm
👍 Image quality 7
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Vibration reduction 5
👎 Weight 4
🤔 Value for money 4
👍 Focal range 4

Canon EF-S 18-55 f/4-5.6 IS STM 18-55mm

78 out of 100 medium confidence 18 reviews

This lens is widely praised for its excellent optics, lightweight design, and quiet STM autofocus, making it a great everyday and travel lens. Users note it rivals Canon's L-series in image quality while being much more affordable, though some mention the plastic mount and lack of weather sealing as drawbacks. Verified buyers highlight its sharpness, effective image stabilization, and value for money, especially when purchased as a kit lens. However, a few users report limitations with autofocus points on certain camera bodies and note it is not a true macro lens.

Pros
  • Excellent image quality rivaling L-series
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Quiet and smooth STM autofocus
  • Effective image stabilization
  • Great value for money
Cons
  • Plastic mount instead of metal
  • No weather sealing
  • Limited autofocus points on some bodies
  • Not a true macro lens
  • Inferior image quality to 18-135mm
👍 Image quality 6
🤔 Build quality 4
👍 Value for money 5
👍 Autofocus performance 4
👍 Image stabilization 3
👍 Weight and portability 4

Scores

Macro
Nikon
73
Canon
89
Budget
Nikon
87
Canon
86
Street
Nikon
73
Canon
86
Travel
Nikon
68
Canon
80
Portrait
Nikon
78
Canon
75
Video Cinema
Nikon
72
Canon
75
Landscape
Nikon
68
Canon
70
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
61
Canon
70
Professional
Nikon
63
Canon
69

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mmCanon EF-S 18-55 f/4-5.6 IS STM 18-55mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max85 mm55 mm
Elements—12
Groups—10
Aspherical Elements3★1
ED Elements2★—
CoatingSuper Integrated CoatingSuper Spectra coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/4
Min Aperture3.5-5.64-5.6
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountNikon FCanon EF-S
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weight0.48 kg0.20 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAF-SSTM★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance380 mm66 mm★
Max Magnification—1:4★

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile

Canon EF-S 18-55 f/4-5.6 IS STM 18-55mm

  • Strong macro (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 1 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm Better at:

Portrait

Canon EF-S 18-55 f/4-5.6 IS STM 18-55mm Better at:

MacroStreetTravelProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports