Sigma Art 33B965 30mm

Sigma Art 33B965 30mm

Sigma
72 Overall Score
vs
Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm

Viltrox
88 Overall Score

Scores

Portrait
Sigma
76
Viltrox
100
Video Cinema
Sigma
66
Viltrox
94
Professional
Sigma
64
Viltrox
89
Street
Sigma
86
Viltrox
83
Budget
Sigma
66
Viltrox
83
Macro
Sigma
72
Viltrox
65
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
61
Viltrox
71
Landscape
Sigma
47
Viltrox
69
Travel
Sigma
53
Viltrox
56

Specifications

Sigma Art 33B965 30mmViltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm
Optics
Typestandardprime
Focal Length Min30 mm27 mm
Focal Length Max30 mm27 mm
Elements—15
Groups—11
Aspherical Elements2★1
ED Elements22
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingHD Nano multilayer coating with water-resistant and antifouling coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/1.2
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.2
Constant—✓★
Diaphragm Blades711★
Build
MountSony ESony E
Formatmicro-four-thirdsAPS-C★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.14 kg★0.56 kg
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeLinear motor★STM
Stabilization—✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance300 mm280 mm★
Max Magnification1:8.1★0.15x

Pros & Cons

Sigma Art 33B965 30mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm

  • Strong aperture (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm

Scores 88 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Sigma Art 33B965 30mm Better at:

MacroStreet

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm Better at:

BudgetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports