Ultimaxx UM-WA4358 37mm
Ultimaxx
35 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Panasonic
88 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Travel
Landscape
Budget
Video Cinema
Professional
Portrait
Street
Wildlife Sports
Specifications
| Ultimaxx UM-WA4358 37mm | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 37 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 37 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | — | 17 |
| Groups | — | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | — | 4★ |
| Coating | Multi-Coated | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | — | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | — | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | — | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | T-mount | L-Mount |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.41 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 46 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Auto Focus | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 6.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 140 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.5x★ |
Pros & Cons
Ultimaxx UM-WA4358 37mm
- Strong aperture (67th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average social proof (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Verdict
Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 22 specs.