Zeiss Otus 100mm f/1.4 ZF.2 100mm

Zeiss Otus 100mm f/1.4 ZF.2 100mm

Zeiss
36 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Zeiss
39
Nikon
95
Portrait
Zeiss
38
Nikon
89
Street
Zeiss
31
Nikon
86
Budget
Zeiss
24
Nikon
86
Macro
Zeiss
44
Nikon
85
Landscape
Zeiss
33
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Zeiss
32
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
Zeiss
22
Nikon
78
Travel
Zeiss
17
Nikon
75

Specifications

Zeiss Otus 100mm f/1.4 ZF.2 100mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min100 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max100 mm28 mm
Elements1413
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements13
ED Elements93
CoatingZEISS T* anti-reflective coatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.4f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountNikon FNikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight1.34 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread86 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeManual FocusStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance1.00 m190 mm
Max Magnification1:8.61:5.26

Pros & Cons

Zeiss Otus 100mm f/1.4 ZF.2 100mm

  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average build (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports