Meike 35mm F2.0 E

Meike 35mm F2.0 E

Meike
58 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III-A B070 17-70mm

Tamron Di III-A B070 17-70mm

Tamron
91 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Meike 35mm F2.0 E

85 out of 100 high confidence 57 reviews

The Meike lenses are widely praised for delivering impressive sharpness, fast autofocus, and excellent value for money, often compared favorably to much more expensive native lenses. Users highlight solid build quality, smooth manual focus rings, and pleasing bokeh, though a small number note minor issues like aperture ring looseness or focus hunting in very low light. Overall, it's seen as a fantastic budget-friendly option for photographers seeking prime performance without breaking the bank.

Pros
  • Impressive sharpness for the price
  • Fast and quiet autofocus
  • Solid build quality
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Good value for money
Cons
  • Aperture ring has slight play on some units
  • Autofocus can hunt in very low light
  • Lens hood attachment can feel stiff
  • Minimum focus distance is somewhat long
  • Some chromatic aberration in high contrast scenes
👍 Sharpness 32
👍 Autofocus performance 28
👍 Build quality 22
👍 Value for money 18
👍 Bokeh 14
🤔 Low light performance 10

Tamron Di III-A B070 17-70mm

85 out of 100 high confidence 62 reviews

The Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD lens is widely praised for its sharpness, versatile zoom range, constant aperture, and effective stabilization, making it an excellent all-around lens for APS-C cameras. Users appreciate its solid build quality and value for money, though many note it is noticeably heavier and larger than typical kit lenses, which can feel unbalanced on smaller camera bodies. A few reviewers mention minor issues like chromatic aberration at the longer end and noise from the aperture blades at certain settings, but overall sentiment is very positive.

Pros
  • sharp image quality across zoom range
  • constant f/2.8 aperture
  • effective image stabilization
  • fast and quiet autofocus
  • versatile 17-70mm focal range
Cons
  • heavy and large for APS-C body
  • chromatic aberration at 50-70mm
  • aperture blade noise above f/5.6
  • short zoom throw initially stiff
  • no aperture ring on Fuji version
👍 Image quality 27
👍 Build quality 15
🤔 Weight and size 18
👍 Value for money 14
👍 Stabilization 12
👍 Autofocus performance 11

Scores

Professional
Meike
48
Tamron
88
Macro
Meike
55
Tamron
88
Budget
Meike
54
Tamron
88
Portrait
Meike
48
Tamron
87
Video Cinema
Meike
46
Tamron
83
Landscape
Meike
47
Tamron
81
Travel
Meike
50
Tamron
78
Street
Meike
55
Tamron
75
Wildlife Sports
Meike
39
Tamron
72

Specifications

Meike 35mm F2.0 ETamron Di III-A B070 17-70mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm70 mm
Elements1116
Groups912
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements22
CoatingMultilayered CoatingsFluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades11★9
Build
MountNikon ZNikon Z
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.29 kg★0.54 kg
Filter Thread58 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusRXD
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance450 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification—1:4.8★

Pros & Cons

Meike 35mm F2.0 E

  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (76th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Tamron Di III-A B070 17-70mm

  • Strong optical (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile

Pricing

Meike 35mm F2.0 E

Tamron Di III-A B070 17-70mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III-A B070 17-70mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III-A B070 17-70mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider