Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Canon
61 Overall Score
vs
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3

OM System
61 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

No customer feedback yet

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3

96 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

This lens receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with users praising its sharpness, fast autofocus, and lightweight design. Many note it as a significant upgrade from previous lenses, especially when paired with teleconverters. The only minor consideration mentioned is the comparison with a Sigma alternative, but the Sony's weight and teleconverter compatibility won out.

Pros
  • Super sharp wide open
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Lightweight design
  • Excellent with teleconverters
  • Great for video and photos
Cons
  • Expensive compared to alternatives
  • Heavier than some competitors
  • No built-in image stabilization
👍 Image quality 6
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👍 Weight and portability 4
👍 Teleconverter compatibility 2
🤔 Value for money 2
👍 Build quality 2

Scores

Travel
Canon
76
OM System
67
Landscape
Canon
74
OM System
67
Budget
Canon
66
OM System
52
Professional
Canon
65
OM System
51
Macro
Canon
51
OM System
62
Wildlife Sports
Canon
62
OM System
50
Street
Canon
59
OM System
49
Video Cinema
Canon
57
OM System
41
Portrait
Canon
45
OM System
37

Specifications

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USMOM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm12 mm
Focal Length Max40 mm200 mm
Elements1216
Groups911
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements1★—
CoatingSuper Spectra coatingZERO coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/22
Min Aperturef/43.5-6.3
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountCanon EFMicro Four Thirds
Formatfull-frame★micro-four-thirds
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.50 kg0.46 kg★
Filter Thread77 mm72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSM★Autofocus
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm220 mm★
Max Magnification0.24x1:2.7★

Pros & Cons

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong optical (78th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (76th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3

  • Strong user sentiment (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong optical (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong macro (79th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Verdict

═ Tie

Both products are closely matched - Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM wins 4 specs while OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3 wins 3.

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3 Better at:

Macro