Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN

Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN

Sigma
100 Overall Score
vs
Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 35mm

Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 35mm

Olympus
51 Overall Score

Scores

Street
Sigma
100
Olympus
55
Travel
Sigma
100
Olympus
48
Budget
Sigma
97
Olympus
48
Professional
Sigma
97
Olympus
51
Portrait
Sigma
89
Olympus
36
Macro
Sigma
88
Olympus
43
Video Cinema
Sigma
86
Olympus
47
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
82
Olympus
44
Landscape
Sigma
81
Olympus
51

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DNOlympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min18 mm12 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm12 mm
Elements1311
Groups108
Aspherical Elements32
ED Elements11
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingZERO Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2
Constant
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountSony EMicro Four Thirds
FormatAPS-Cmicro-four-thirds
Weather Sealed
Weight0.29 kg0.13 kg
Filter Thread55 mm46 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typestepping motorMSC
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance121 mm200 mm
Max Magnification1:2.80.08x

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN

  • Strong macro (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong af (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile

Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 35mm

  • Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (77th percentile)
  • Strong optical (71st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)
  • Below average macro (35th percentile)

Verdict

Winner: Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports