Vivitar V420-800-EOS-R 420-800mm

Vivitar V420-800-EOS-R 420-800mm

Vivitar
43 Overall Score
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
89 Overall Score

Scores

Travel
Vivitar
56
Sony
94
Budget
Vivitar
53
Sony
91
Street
Vivitar
50
Sony
90
Video Cinema
Vivitar
36
Sony
85
Wildlife Sports
Vivitar
38
Sony
84
Landscape
Vivitar
44
Sony
79
Portrait
Vivitar
37
Sony
77
Professional
Vivitar
37
Sony
77
Macro
Vivitar
39
Sony
68

Specifications

Vivitar V420-800-EOS-R 420-800mmSony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min420 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max800 mm50 mm
Elements—9
Groups—8
Aspherical Elements—4★
ED Elements11
Coatingmulti-coated—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/3.5
Min Aperturef/8.33.5-5.6
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades—7★
Build
MountCanon RFSony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.07 kg★0.11 kg
Filter Thread62 mm41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyAutofocus
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance1.60 m250 mm★
Max Magnification—0.215x★

Pros & Cons

Vivitar V420-800-EOS-R 420-800mm

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (73rd percentile)
  • Strong versatility (70th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (28th percentile)

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports