Tamron All-In-One Zoom AFB016C-700 16-300mm

Tamron All-In-One Zoom AFB016C-700 16-300mm

Tamron
73 Overall Score
vs
Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox
69 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Tamron All-In-One Zoom AFB016C-700 16-300mm

78 out of 100 low confidence 9 reviews

The Tamron 16-300mm lens is praised for its incredible versatility, combining wide-angle, macro, and telephoto capabilities in a compact package. Users highlight its convenience for travel and hiking, allowing them to capture a wide range of subjects without changing lenses. However, some reviewers note compromises in image quality, including softness at long focal lengths and chromatic aberration, which can often be corrected in post-processing. Build quality is generally considered good, though a few users mention zoom creep and autofocus inconsistencies.

Pros
  • Incredible zoom range (16-300mm)
  • Compact and lightweight design
  • Excellent versatility for travel
  • Good macro capability
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Softness at long focal lengths
  • Chromatic aberration (fringing)
  • Zoom creep when held vertically
  • Autofocus inconsistencies in low light
  • Heavy weight for some users
👍 Versatility 6
🤔 Image quality 7
👍 Build quality 5
👎 Chromatic aberration 3
👎 Zoom creep 2
🤔 Autofocus performance 3

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

85 out of 100 high confidence 95 reviews

The Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.7 lens is widely loved for its sharp image quality, fast aperture, and surprisingly low price. Users praise its lightweight design, compact size, and quick autofocus, making it an excellent everyday walk-around lens. Some note autofocus can be noisier or slower than premium lenses, and a few report chromatic aberration in high-contrast scenes. A handful of complaints involve inconsistent packaging or compatibility misunderstandings, but the overall sentiment is overwhelmingly positive.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality wide open
  • Fast f/1.7 aperture for low light
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Great value for the price
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
Cons
  • Autofocus noise in quiet environments
  • Chromatic aberration in high contrast
  • No weather sealing
  • Slow autofocus in low light
  • Missing aperture ring
👍 Image quality 45
👍 Value for money 35
👍 Build quality 30
🤔 Autofocus performance 28
👍 Bokeh 15
👍 Low light performance 18

Scores

Portrait
Tamron
77
Viltrox
62
Budget
Tamron
76
Viltrox
63
Street
Tamron
65
Viltrox
71
Macro
Tamron
69
Viltrox
64
Travel
Tamron
67
Viltrox
56
Video Cinema
Tamron
66
Viltrox
61
Landscape
Tamron
62
Viltrox
54
Professional
Tamron
60
Viltrox
53
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
58
Viltrox
59

Specifications

Tamron All-In-One Zoom AFB016C-700 16-300mmViltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm
Optics
Typetelephotoprime
Focal Length Min16 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm35 mm
Elements1611
Groups129
Aspherical Elements—1★
ED Elements—1★
Coatingmultiple layers of coatingnano multi-layer coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/16
Min Aperture3.5-6.3f/1.7
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountCanon EF-SFujifilm X
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed—✗
Weight0.54 kg0.17 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypePiezo DriveSTM★
Stabilization✓★✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance390 mm330 mm★
Max Magnification1:2.91:7.7

Pros & Cons

Tamron All-In-One Zoom AFB016C-700 16-300mm

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong aperture (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (79th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

  • Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong macro (68th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron All-In-One Zoom AFB016C-700 16-300mm

Scores 73 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 1 of 21 specs.

Tamron All-In-One Zoom AFB016C-700 16-300mm Better at:

MacroBudgetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo Cinema

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm Better at:

Street