Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0

Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0

Sigma
73 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon
85 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Sigma
65
Canon
97
Portrait
Sigma
84
Canon
89
Video Cinema
Sigma
84
Canon
89
Street
Sigma
89
Canon
80
Professional
Sigma
87
Canon
70
Travel
Sigma
67
Canon
76
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
69
Canon
72
Landscape
Sigma
63
Canon
72
Macro
Sigma
69
Canon
71

Specifications

Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min135 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max135 mm135 mm
Elements1316
Groups1012
Aspherical Elements—1★
ED Elements4★1
Coatingwasserabweisende Beschichtung, antistatisches GlasSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.4f/3.5
Min Aperturef/1.83.5-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountSony ECanon EF-S
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight0.09 kg★0.52 kg
Filter Thread105 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHyper Sonic AF MotorSTM★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance875 mm390 mm★
Max Magnification—0.28x★

Pros & Cons

Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong aperture (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0 Better at:

StreetProfessional

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Better at:

MacroBudgetTravelPortraitLandscapeVideo CinemaWildlife Sports