Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0

Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0

Sigma
73 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Overall Score

Scores

Street
Sigma
89
Nikon
97
Budget
Sigma
65
Nikon
94
Professional
Sigma
87
Nikon
74
Travel
Sigma
67
Nikon
85
Portrait
Sigma
84
Nikon
81
Video Cinema
Sigma
84
Nikon
83
Landscape
Sigma
63
Nikon
80
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
69
Nikon
76
Macro
Sigma
69
Nikon
73

Specifications

Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min135 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max135 mm50 mm
Elements139
Groups107
Aspherical Elements—4★
ED Elements4★1
Coatingwasserabweisende Beschichtung, antistatisches GlasSuper Integrated Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.4f/3.5
Min Aperturef/1.83.5-6.3
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight0.09 kg★0.14 kg
Filter Thread105 mm46 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHyper Sonic AF MotorStepping Motor★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops—4.5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance875 mm200 mm★
Max Magnification—0.2x★

Pros & Cons

Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong aperture (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0 Better at:

PortraitProfessional

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeWildlife Sports