JBL Tune 680NC

JBL Tune 680NC

JBL
66 Overall Score
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Beyerdynamic
82 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
JBL
62
Beyerdynamic
84
Commute
JBL
69
Beyerdynamic
84
Music
JBL
70
Beyerdynamic
81
Gaming
JBL
75
Beyerdynamic
81
Work
JBL
74
Beyerdynamic
78
Studio
JBL
57
Beyerdynamic
77
Calls
JBL
62
Beyerdynamic
68

Specifications

JBL Tune 680NCBeyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Design
Form Factoron-earon-ear
Open/Closedclosedclosed
Foldable
Weight0.16 kg0.22 kg
Ear Cushionreplaceable ear pads
Headbandaluminum and durable textiles
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size32 mm45 mm
Drivers11
Freq Min10 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz22 kHz
Impedance32 Ω48 Ω
Sensitivity98 dB
Max SPL93 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC TypeAdaptiveAdaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth6.05.4
ProfilesA2DP, AVRCP, HFPAVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6
Multipoint
Wired ConnectorUSB-C3.5mm
Detachable Cable
Range15 m
Battery
Battery Life76 hrs40 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs1.5 hrs
Fast Charging5min=5hrs15 Minutes for 15 Hours
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Capacity690 mAh630 mAh
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count22
NC Mic
Boom Mic
Detachable Mic
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Fast Pair
Touch Controls
AppJBL Headphonesbeyerdynamic app
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode

Pros & Cons

JBL Tune 680NC

  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong battery (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong comfort (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average social proof (13th percentile)13th %ile

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

  • Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile

Verdict

Winner: Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Scores 82 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 5 of 41 specs.

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 Better at:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute