XFX RX-97SWFB3B9
XFX
83 Overall Score
vs
HyperRender Radeon RX 580 8GB GDDR5
HyperRender
35 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
XFX RX-97SWFB3B9
No customer feedback yet
HyperRender Radeon RX 580 8GB GDDR5
62 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews
The RX 580 receives mixed feedback. Many users praise it as a budget-friendly upgrade for older PCs, noting improved gaming performance at 1080p and smooth operation for basic tasks. However, several verified buyers report serious issues like display artifacts, black screens, and non-functional ports, making the card unreliable for some.
Pros
- Budget-friendly upgrade for old PCs
- Improved gaming performance at 1080p
- Smooth operation for basic tasks
- Good value for money
- Easy installation and driver recognition
Cons
- Display artifacts and glitches
- Black screen on Windows start button
- Non-functional HDMI port
- Only 2 of 3 DisplayPorts working
- Unreliable multi-monitor support
Value for money 4
Gaming performance 3
Display artifacts 2
Port functionality 3
Multi monitor support 2
Ease of installation 3
Scores
Ray Tracing
Content Creation
Gaming 4k
Gaming 1440p
Budget
Gaming 1080p
Workstation
Ai Llm
Specifications
| XFX RX-97SWFB3B9 | HyperRender Radeon RX 580 | |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | ||
| GPU Chipset | Radeon RX 9070 | Radeon RX 580 |
| Brand | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture | RDNA 4 | 14nm |
| Class | consumer | consumer |
| Process | 4★ | 14 |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 16 GB★ | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6★ | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bus | ||
| Bandwidth | ||
| ECC | — | ✗ |
| Compute | ||
| Stream Processors | ||
| Tensor Cores | No data | |
| RT Cores | 56★ | 54 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| FP16 TFLOPS | 72.25★ | 55.29999923706055 |
| FP32 TFLOPS | 36.130001068115234★ | 27.649999618530273 |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark G3D | ||
| GPU Compute | ||
| Power & Cooling | ||
| TDP | 245★ | 295 |
| Recommended PSU | 800 | 450★ |
| Power Connectors | 3 x 8-Pin | — |
| Cooler | Triple Fan★ | Dual Fan |
| Fans | 3★ | 2 |
| Connectivity | ||
| Interface | PCI Express 5.0 x16 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| DisplayPort | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | — | 0★ |
| Max Displays | 4★ | 2 |
| Max Resolution | 7680 x 4320 | — |
| Physical | ||
| Length | 325★ | — |
| Slot Width | 3.5 | 2★ |
| Form Factor | ATX | Full Height |
| Weight | 1.50 kg★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Ray Tracing | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Upscaling | AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 4 | — |
| AV1 Encode | ✓★ | ✗ |
| VR Ready | ✓★ | — |
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| RGB | ✗ | — |
Pros & Cons
XFX RX-97SWFB3B9
- Strong connectivity (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong compute (87th percentile)87th %ile
HyperRender Radeon RX 580 8GB GDDR5
- Strong compute (75th percentile)
- Strong social proof (69th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average feature (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average efficiency (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average raster (23rd percentile)
Pricing
XFX RX-97SWFB3B90.001score per dollar
vs
HyperRender Radeon RX 580 8GB GDDR50.002score per dollar
HyperRender Radeon RX 580 8GB GDDR5 offers 2.0x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: XFX RX-97SWFB3B9
Scores 83 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 22 of 40 specs.
