Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics
100 Overall Score
vs
Cillso H97

Cillso H97

Cillso
48 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Technics EAH-AZ100

88 out of 100 medium confidence 28 reviews

The Technics EAH-AZ100 earbuds are overwhelmingly praised for their exceptional sound quality, with users highlighting deep bass, clear highs, and immersive audio. Comfort, battery life, and noise cancellation are also frequently commended, though some users note the price is high and volume could be louder. A few minor issues like Bluetooth LE disconnects and initial multi-device pairing were mentioned, but overall sentiment is very positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional sound quality
  • Deep immersive bass
  • Effective noise cancellation
  • Comfortable fit
  • Excellent battery life
Cons
  • High price point
  • Limited maximum volume
  • Bluetooth LE disconnects
  • Initial multi-device pairing issues
  • Plastic exterior
👍 Sound quality 12
👍 Bass performance 6
👍 Noise cancellation 5
👍 Comfort 6
👍 Battery life 5
🤔 Value for money 4

Cillso H97

72 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

These earbuds are generally well-liked for their value, offering good sound and battery life at a low price. However, some users report connectivity issues, poor noise reduction, and a defective unit that stopped working after a few days. Overall, they are a decent budget option but not without flaws.

Pros
  • Good sound quality
  • Great value for money
  • Long battery life
  • Comfortable fit
  • Clear audio
Cons
  • Connectivity issues
  • Poor noise reduction
  • Defective unit after few days
  • Loose charging cable
  • Intermittent volume fluctuation
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Sound quality 5
👍 Battery life 4
👎 Connectivity 2
👎 Noise reduction 2
👎 Build quality 2

Scores

Music
Technics
100
Cillso
49
Travel
Technics
94
Cillso
47
Commute
Technics
94
Cillso
50
Calls
Technics
93
Cillso
48
Gaming
Technics
92
Cillso
54
Budget
Technics
88
Cillso
76
Fitness
Technics
88
Cillso
30

Specifications

Technics EAH-AZ100Cillso H97
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelesssemi-in-ear
Ear Tips5 x Eartip Pairs—
Weight0.01 kg★—
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm13 mm★
Drivers1★—
Freq Min20 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max40 kHz★20 kHz
Impedance16 Ω32 Ω
Hi-Res Audio✓★—
CodecsAAC, LC3, LDAC, SBCAAC, SBC
SurroundDolby Atmos, Spatial Audio—
Noise Control
ANC✓✓
ANC TypeadaptiveENC
Transparency✓★—
Connectivity
Wireless✓✓
Bluetooth5.35.4★
ProfilesAVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP—
Multipoint✓★—
Wired ConnectorBluetooth—
Range10 m★—
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs8 hrs
Charge Time2.5 hrs1.5 hrs★
Fast Charging15 min. for 90 min. playbackType-C fast charging
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery28 hrs40 hrs★
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging✓★—
Microphone
Microphone✓✓
Mic Count6★4
NC Mic✓✓
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Assistant, Sirivoice assistants
Touch Controls✓✓
AppAndroid & iOS—
Volume Limiting✗—
Gaming Mode✗—
Bone Conduction✗✗
Water ResistanceIPX4IPX7

Pros & Cons

Technics EAH-AZ100

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong sound (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile

Cillso H97

  • Strong mic (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong battery (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong anc (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong affordability (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average comfort (27th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (34th percentile)

Pricing

Cillso H97 is ₹44,149 cheaper (11.9x less).

Technics EAH-AZ1000.002score per dollar
vs
Cillso H970.012score per dollar

Cillso H97 offers 6.0x better value for money

Technics EAH-AZ100

Cillso H97

Verdict

★ Winner: Technics EAH-AZ100

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 9 of 39 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100 Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Also Consider