CCA KZ ZAS kz_zas

CCA KZ ZAS kz_zas

CCA
36 Overall Score
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics
100 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

CCA KZ ZAS kz_zas

50 out of 100 low confidence 6 reviews

The KZ ZAS in-ear monitors receive mixed feedback. Several users praise their comfort and value for the price, especially for drummers upgrading from older models. However, multiple verified buyers report units arriving broken or failing after first use, with issues like a broken filter, no sound, or intermittent audio cutting out. The overall sentiment is sharply divided between excellent budget performance and poor reliability.

Pros
  • Comfortable fit
  • Great value for the price
  • Impressive sound for drummers
  • Good upgrade from older models
Cons
  • Units arrive broken or defective
  • Audio cuts out intermittently
  • Low volume handling capacity
  • Poor build quality reported
  • Filter breaks easily
👎 Build quality 4
👍 Value for money 3
👍 Comfort 1
🤔 Sound quality 3
👎 Reliability 3
👎 Volume handling 1

Technics EAH-AZ100

88 out of 100 medium confidence 28 reviews

The Technics EAH-AZ100 earbuds are overwhelmingly praised for their exceptional sound quality, with users highlighting deep bass, clear highs, and immersive audio. Comfort, battery life, and noise cancellation are also frequently commended, though some users note the price is high and volume could be louder. A few minor issues like Bluetooth LE disconnects and initial multi-device pairing were mentioned, but overall sentiment is very positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional sound quality
  • Deep immersive bass
  • Effective noise cancellation
  • Comfortable fit
  • Excellent battery life
Cons
  • High price point
  • Limited maximum volume
  • Bluetooth LE disconnects
  • Initial multi-device pairing issues
  • Plastic exterior
👍 Sound quality 12
👍 Bass performance 6
👍 Noise cancellation 5
👍 Comfort 6
👍 Battery life 5
🤔 Value for money 4

Scores

Budget
CCA
52
Technics
98
Travel
CCA
30
Technics
95
Calls
CCA
23
Technics
93
Commute
CCA
29
Technics
90
Music
CCA
43
Technics
90
Gaming
CCA
36
Technics
88
Fitness
CCA
43
Technics
80

Specifications

CCA KZ ZAS kz_zasTechnics EAH-AZ100
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelesstrue wireless
Ear Tipss5 x Eartip Pairs
Weight0.08 kg0.05 kg★
Audio
Driver Typehybriddynamic
Driver Size10 mm10 mm
Drivers8★1
Freq Min—20 Hz★
Freq Max40 kHz40 kHz
Impedance24 Ω16 Ω
Hi-Res Audio✓✓
Codecs—AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC
Surround—Dolby Atmos
Noise Control
ANC✗✓★
ANC Type—adaptive
Transparency✗✓★
Connectivity
Wireless✗✓★
Bluetooth—5.3★
Profiles—AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP
Multipoint✗✓★
Wired Connector—Bluetooth
Range—10 m★
Earbud Battery
Battery Life—8 hrs★
Charge Time—2.5 hrs★
Fast Charging—15 min. for 90 min. playback
ChargingproprietaryUSB-C★
Case Battery
Case Battery—28 hrs★
Case ChargingproprietaryUSB-C★
Wireless Charging✗✓★
Microphone
Microphone✓✓
Mic Count—6★
NC Mic✗✓★
Features
Voice Assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Touch Controls✗✓★
App—Android & iOS
Volume Limiting—✗
Gaming Mode✗✗
Bone Conduction✗✗
Water ResistanceWater-ResistantIPX4

Pros & Cons

CCA KZ ZAS kz_zas

  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong comfort (72nd percentile)
  • Strong build (71st percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average anc (31st percentile)

Technics EAH-AZ100

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile

Pricing

CCA KZ ZAS kz_zas is ₹34,367 cheaper (3.5x less).

CCA KZ ZAS kz_zas0.003score per dollar
vs
Technics EAH-AZ1000.002score per dollar

CCA KZ ZAS kz_zas offers 1.5x better value for money

CCA KZ ZAS kz_zas

Technics EAH-AZ100

Verdict

★ Winner: Technics EAH-AZ100

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 39 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100 Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Also Consider