HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
96 Overall Score
vs
Acer Chromebox DT.Z5CAA.003 Black 2025

Acer Chromebox DT.Z5CAA.003 Black 2025

Acer
44 Overall Score

Scores

Gaming
HP
91
Acer
9
Developer
HP
87
Acer
31
Creator
HP
87
Acer
13
Home Office
HP
87
Acer
38
Business
HP
87
Acer
38
Workstation
HP
85
Acer
27
Ai Llm
HP
68
Acer
14
Compact
HP
30
Acer
45

Specifications

HP OMEN GT16-0364Acer Chromebox DT.Z5CAA.003
Processor
CPU*AMD Ryzen 7 8700F★—
CPU Multi-Core Score
30,931
15,270
Cores810★
Frequency4.1 GHz★1.4 GHz
L3 Cache16 MB★12 MB
Graphics
GPU*NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070★Intel Graphics
GPU Benchmark Score
28,703
3,170
Typediscreteintegrated★
VRAM12 GB★—
VRAM TypeGDDR7DDR4 SDRAM★
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB★8 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5★DDR4
Storage 11 TB★256 GB
Storage 1 TypeSSDSSD
Build
Form Factormid-towermini
PSU850W★90W
Weight14.50 kg1.70 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports2★1
USB Ports8★7
Thunderbolt0—
HDMI1 x HDMI2 x HDMI
DisplayPort3 x DisplayPort1x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3★Bluetooth
EthernetGigabit Ethernet2.5 Gigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 HomeChromeOS

Pros & Cons

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

Acer Chromebox DT.Z5CAA.003 Black 2025

  • Strong port selection (79th percentile)
  • Below average ram (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average storage (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average reliability (32nd percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 14 of 26 specs.

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Better at:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

Acer Chromebox DT.Z5CAA.003 Better at:

Compact