ACEMAGIC M5

ACEMAGIC M5

ACEMAGIC
56 Overall Score
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
96 Overall Score

Scores

Gaming
ACEMAGIC
13
HP
91
Developer
ACEMAGIC
45
HP
87
Creator
ACEMAGIC
21
HP
87
Home Office
ACEMAGIC
57
HP
87
Business
ACEMAGIC
48
HP
87
Workstation
ACEMAGIC
44
HP
85
Ai Llm
ACEMAGIC
21
HP
68
Compact
ACEMAGIC
52
HP
30

Specifications

ACEMAGIC M5HP OMEN GT16-0364
Processor
CPU*Intel Core i7 14650HX★AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
CPU Multi-Core Score
33,594
30,931
Cores24★8
Frequency5.2 GHz★4.1 GHz
L3 Cache30 MB★16 MB
Graphics
GPU*Intel Iris Xe GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070★
GPU Benchmark Score
2,593
28,703
Typeintegrated★discrete
VRAM—12 GB★
VRAM TypeSharedGDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM16 GB32 GB★
RAM GenerationDDR4DDR5★
Storage 11 TB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeNVMe SSD★SSD
Build
Form Factorminimid-tower
PSU—850W★
Weight—14.50 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports—2★
USB Ports—8★
Thunderbolt—0
HDMIHDMI 2.01 x HDMI
DisplayPortDP 1.43 x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E★Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth—Bluetooth 5.3★
Ethernet—Gigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 ProWindows 11 Home

Pros & Cons

ACEMAGIC M5

  • Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong storage (74th percentile)
  • Strong cpu (72nd percentile)
  • Below average reliability (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average port selection (32nd percentile)
  • Below average ram (33rd percentile)

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 9 of 26 specs.

ACEMAGIC M5 Better at:

Compact

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Better at:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation