AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 16-core sTR4

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 16-core sTR4

AMD
65 Overall Score
vs
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851

Intel
98 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 16-core sTR4

72 out of 100 medium confidence 10 reviews

The AMD Threadripper 1950X is praised for its raw performance and productivity capabilities, especially in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking. However, opinions on gaming are mixed, with some noting it's overkill for gaming and others seeing future benefits. Users appreciate the 64 PCIe lanes and ECC support, but caution about power supply requirements and RAM compatibility.

Pros
  • Excellent productivity performance
  • 64 PCIe lanes
  • ECC memory support
  • Great for video editing and rendering
  • Future-proof for gaming
Cons
  • Overkill for gaming
  • High power supply requirement
  • RAM compatibility issues
  • Limited cooler support at launch
  • Potential virtualization sluggishness
🤔 Gaming performance 4
👍 Productivity performance 3
👎 Power requirements 2
👎 Ram compatibility 2
👍 Pcie lanes 2
🤔 Cooler support 2

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851

88 out of 100 high confidence 32 reviews

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is overwhelmingly praised for its raw performance, especially in 4K gaming and heavy multitasking, with users noting significant upgrades from older CPUs. It runs cool with proper cooling solutions, and its efficiency and support for DDR5 and PCIe 5.0 are highlighted as major advantages. Some mention that it may not beat AMD in 1080p/1440p gaming, but it excels at 4K and productivity. A few note the lack of a cooler and tray packaging as minor drawbacks, but overall sentiment is very positive.

Pros
  • Excellent 4K gaming performance
  • Strong multitasking and productivity
  • Runs cool with proper cooling
  • Supports DDR5 and PCIe 5.0
  • Power efficient (125W TDP)
Cons
  • No cooler included
  • Tray packaging (no retail box)
  • May lag AMD in 1080p/1440p gaming
  • Requires BIOS adjustments for best performance
  • Premium price
👍 Gaming performance 8
👍 Multitasking productivity 6
👍 Thermal management 5
👍 Power efficiency 4
👍 Memory support 4
👍 Value for money 3

Scores

Ai Llm
AMD
70
Intel
100
Budget
AMD
44
Intel
100
Productivity
AMD
81
Intel
100
Gaming
AMD
40
Intel
90
Efficiency
AMD
34
Intel
85
Server
AMD
78
Intel
84

Specifications

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950XIntel Core Ultra 9 285K
Processor
BrandAMDIntel
SeriesRyzen ThreadripperCore Ultra 9
Model1950X285K
CodenameWhitehaven (Zen)Arrow Lake-S
Classhedtdesktop
Process143★
Cores & Clocks
Cores1624★
P-cores—8★
E-cores—16★
Threads32★24
Base Clock
3,400
4,600
Boost Clock
4,000
5,700
Cache
L2 Cache840★
L3 Cache3236★
Performance
PassMark Multi
27,822
67,259
PassMark Single
2,285
5,087
Memory
Memory TypeDDR4DDR5★
Max Speed
2,667
6,400
Channels4★2
Max MemoryNo data
192
ECC✓✓
Platform & Power
SocketsTR4LGA 1851
PCIe3.05.0
PCIe Lanes64★24
TDP180125★
Max Turbo Power—250★
Unlocked✓✓
Graphics & AI
Integrated Graphics—Intel Graphics
NPU TOPS—13★

Pros & Cons

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 16-core sTR4

  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong platform (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong ai (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851

  • Strong feature (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong single thread (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 16-core sTR4

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851

Verdict

★ Winner: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Scores 98 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 16 of 29 specs.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Better at:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity