Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green
Fujifilm
20 Overall Score
vs
OM System OM-1 OM-1 Black
OM System
90 Overall Score
Scores
Sports Wildlife
Beginner
Wedding Events
Video
Photography
Youtube
Travel
Product Photography
Vlogging
Streaming
Specifications
| Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 | OM System OM-1 OM-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | BSI MOS |
| Size | 1/1.7-inch | micro-four-thirds |
| Megapixels | 10 MP | 20.399999618530273 MP★ |
| ISO Range | — | 200★ |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | No data | |
| AF Type | — | Photo, VideoPhase Detection: 1053 |
| Eye AF | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Animal AF | ✗ | — |
| Subject Detection | ✗ | — |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 10 fps★ |
| Burst (Electronic) | — | 120 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | — | 1/32000 |
| Electronic Shutter | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | — | 4K★ |
| 4K FPS | — | 60 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | — | 240 fps★ |
| 10-bit | — | ✓★ |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| RAW Video | — | ✓★ |
| Codec | — | H.264, H.265 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | — | 3"★ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Articulating | ✗ | ✓★ |
| EVF Resolution | — | 5.8M dots★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.20 kg★ | 0.51 kg |
| Battery Life | — | 520 shots★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | ✗ | ✗ |
| USB | — | USB-C★ |
| HDMI | — | Micro-HDMI |
| Hot Shoe | ✗ | ✓★ |
Pros & Cons
Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Below average sensor (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average build (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average connectivity (22nd percentile)
- Below average video (24th percentile)
OM System OM-1 OM-1 Black
- Strong evf (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong af (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong battery (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong burst (95th percentile)95th %ile
Pricing
Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green
OM System OM-1 OM-1 Black
No current pricing available
Verdict
Winner: OM System OM-1 OM-1
Scores 90 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 22 of 32 specs.
