SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk
89 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Kingston Industrial 512GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2230

Kingston Industrial 512GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2230

Kingston
46 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Console
SanDisk
85
Kingston
32
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Kingston
45
Gaming
SanDisk
84
Kingston
41
Laptop
SanDisk
65
Kingston
49
Budget
SanDisk
57
Kingston
59
Portable
SanDisk
23
Kingston
13

Spezifikationen

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Kingston Industrial
Drive
Capacity
8,000
512
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2230
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★4
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
4,700
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
3,400
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
Keine Daten
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
Keine Daten
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗—
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
Keine Daten
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
Keine Daten
Warranty (years)5★—
Features
Heatsink✓★—
Hardware Encryption✓★—

Vor- & Nachteile

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile

Kingston Industrial 512GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2230

  • Strong speed (70th percentile)
  • Below average endurance (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average capacity (35th percentile)

Fazit

★ Gewinner: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 89 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Besser bei:

GamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation