Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
99 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM

Canon EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM

Canon
75 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Landscape
Sigma
100
Canon
66
Budget
Sigma
99
Canon
79
Macro
Sigma
96
Canon
57
Travel
Sigma
94
Canon
77
Portrait
Sigma
92
Canon
70
Video Cinema
Sigma
90
Canon
70
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
87
Canon
75
Professional
Sigma
84
Canon
65
Street
Sigma
80
Canon
82

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OSCanon EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm55 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm200 mm
Elements2017
Groups1411
Aspherical Elements4★1
ED Elements5★1
Coatingwater- and oil-repellent coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/6.3
Min Aperture3.5-6.7f/4.5
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountSony ECanon EF-M
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.61 kg0.26 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHLASTM★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops6 stops★3.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance170 mm★1.00 m
Max Magnification1:2★0.21x

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (88th percentile)88th %ile

Canon EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong versatility (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average macro (28th percentile)

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 99 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Besser bei:

MacroBudgetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Canon EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM Besser bei:

Street