Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR 30mm

Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR 30mm

Fujifilm
58 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
98
Fujifilm
70
Portrait
Sigma
90
Fujifilm
45
Street
Sigma
88
Fujifilm
65
Budget
Sigma
85
Fujifilm
48
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Fujifilm
55
Macro
Sigma
83
Fujifilm
81
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Fujifilm
63
Landscape
Sigma
77
Fujifilm
54
Travel
Sigma
75
Fujifilm
59

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmFujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR 30mm
Optics
Typezoommacro
Focal Length Min16 mm30 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm30 mm
Elements1611
Groups119
Aspherical Elements43
ED Elements52
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades911
Build
MountSony EFujifilm X
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.20 kg
Filter Thread72 mm43 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF MotorLinear motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm100 mm
Max Magnification1:5.551:1

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Fujifilm XF 30mm F2.8 R LM WR 30mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong optical (72nd percentile)
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (35th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports