Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mm

Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mm

Sigma
78 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm

Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm

Meike
42 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
82
Meike
34
Macro
Sigma
79
Meike
29
Landscape
Sigma
77
Meike
44
Video Cinema
Sigma
77
Meike
27
Budget
Sigma
72
Meike
39
Street
Sigma
72
Meike
39
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
69
Meike
31
Travel
Sigma
63
Meike
49
Portrait
Sigma
62
Meike
31

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mmMeike MK-S-35mm 35mm
Optics
Typeprimeprime
Focal Length Min16 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max16 mm35 mm
Elements166
Groups135
Aspherical Elements2
ED Elements5
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingMulti-Layer Nano Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/22
Min Aperturef/1.4f/1.7
Constant
Diaphragm Blades98
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.41 kg0.18 kg
Filter Thread67 mm49 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typestepping motormanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm300 mm
Max Magnification1:100.111x

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mm

  • Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong build (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Meike MK-S-35mm 35mm

  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (74th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (19th percentile)19th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mm

Scores 78 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports