Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 35mm

Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 35mm

Olympus
50 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic
86 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Macro
Olympus
45
Panasonic
99
Budget
Olympus
48
Panasonic
91
Landscape
Olympus
49
Panasonic
86
Travel
Olympus
48
Panasonic
86
Video Cinema
Olympus
46
Panasonic
86
Street
Olympus
54
Panasonic
80
Professional
Olympus
48
Panasonic
80
Portrait
Olympus
34
Panasonic
77
Wildlife Sports
Olympus
41
Panasonic
77

Spezifikationen

Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 35mmPanasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min12 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max12 mm200 mm
Elements1117
Groups813
Aspherical Elements2★1
ED Elements14★
CoatingZERO CoatingFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/4
Min Aperturef/24-7.1
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountMicro Four ThirdsL-Mount
Formatmicro-four-thirdsfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.13 kg★0.41 kg
Filter Thread46 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeMSCAutofocus
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—6.5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance200 mm140 mm★
Max Magnification0.08x0.5x★

Vor- & Nachteile

Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 35mm

  • Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (76th percentile)
  • Strong optical (70th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Scores 86 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports