Audix Studio Headphones A140
Audix
43 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Skullcandy Aviator S6AVW-T740
Skullcandy
83 Gesamtbewertung
Was Käufer sagen
Audix Studio Headphones A140
Noch kein Kundenfeedback
Skullcandy Aviator S6AVW-T740
72 von 100 mittlere Konfidenz 12 Bewertungen
Der Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC erhält gemischte Rückmeldungen. Viele Nutzer loben die hervorragende Klangqualität nach EQ-Anpassung, die robuste Bauweise, die lange Akkulaufzeit und den bequemen Sitz für durchschnittliche Kopfgrößen. Mehrere verifizierte Rezensenten berichten jedoch von starken Unannehmlichkeiten bei größeren Köpfen, matschigem Standardklang, schlechterer Geräuschunterdrückung im Vergleich zu älteren Modellen und fehlendem Bass. Das Produkt spaltet die Meinung stark je nach Kopfgröße und Klangerwartungen.
Vorteile
- Hervorragender Klang nach EQ
- Lange Akkulaufzeit
- Robuste Bauqualität
- Bequem für durchschnittliche Köpfe
- Gute Geräuschunterdrückung für manche
Nachteile
- Unbequem für große Köpfe
- Matschiger Standardklang
- Schwaches ANC für manche
- Mangel an Bass
- Kein automatisches Ausschalten beim Laden
Sound quality 10
Comfort 6
Noise cancellation 7
Battery life 4
Build quality 5
Bass performance 5
Bewertungen
Gaming
Budget
Commute
Music
Work
Studio
Calls
Spezifikationen
| Audix Studio Headphones A140 | Skullcandy Aviator S6AVW-T740 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.20 kg★ | 0.29 kg |
| Ear Cushion | — | memory foam |
| Headband | — | Faux Leather |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | 10 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 25 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 36 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 97 dB | 119.4000015258789 dB★ |
| Max SPL | — | 119.4000015258789 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC Wireless Over-Ear Bluetooth Headphones, THX Spatial Audio with Head Tracking, Adaptive Noise Cancelling, Up to 60 Hours Battery, Microphone for iPhone Android - True Black |
| Surround | — | Spatial Audio |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | 1.7999999523162842 m | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 60 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 0.16670000553131104 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 10 Minutes for 4 Hours |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | — | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 6★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Assistant |
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| App | — | Skullcandy App |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | Water-Resistant |
Vor- & Nachteile
Audix Studio Headphones A140
- Strong build (76th percentile)
- Strong sound (74th percentile)
- Strong comfort (67th percentile)
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
Skullcandy Aviator S6AVW-T740
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong battery (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Preise
Audix Studio Headphones A1400.002Score pro Dollar
vs
Skullcandy Aviator S6AVW-T7400.004Score pro Dollar
Skullcandy Aviator S6AVW-T740 bietet 2.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Skullcandy Aviator S6AVW-T740
Scores 83 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 38 specs.
