SoundPEATS PearlClip Pro
SoundPEATS
54 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Bose Ultra Open 881046-0200
Bose
77 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Fitness
Gaming
Music
Travel
Commute
Calls
Spezifikationen
| SoundPEATS PearlClip Pro | Bose Ultra Open 881046-0200 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | open-ear | open-ear |
| Wearing Style | clip-on | Dual Ear True Wireless Earbud |
| Weight | — | 0.06 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 12 mm★ | — |
| Drivers | 2★ | 1 |
| Impedance | 30 Ω | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | LDAC, SBC, AAC | AAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Spatial Audio |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, HFP |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Range | — | 9.100000381469727 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 6 hrs | 7.5 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 1 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | 10 min for 2 hours | 10 Minutes for 2 Hours |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 24 hrs★ | 19.5 hrs |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✗ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 1 | 4★ |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | No |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | PeatsAudio | Bose Music |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | ✓★ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX5 | IPX4 |
Vor- & Nachteile
SoundPEATS PearlClip Pro
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong battery (72nd percentile)
- Strong mic (71st percentile)
- Below average comfort (30th percentile)
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
Bose Ultra Open 881046-0200
- Strong sound (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong connectivity (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong build (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong battery (74th percentile)
Preise
SoundPEATS PearlClip Pro
Bose Ultra Open 881046-0200
No current pricing available
Fazit
Gewinner: Bose Ultra Open 881046-0200
Scores 77 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 10 of 34 specs.
