Fhumsh i17

Fhumsh i17

Fhumsh
40 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0050

Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0050

Bose
86 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Fhumsh
41
Bose
86
Travel
Fhumsh
40
Bose
81
Calls
Fhumsh
38
Bose
80
Gaming
Fhumsh
35
Bose
76
Music
Fhumsh
26
Bose
75
Commute
Fhumsh
39
Bose
75
Fitness
Fhumsh
21
Bose
71

Spezifikationen

Fhumsh i17Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0050
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless
Ear TipsS, M, LSmall, Medium, Large
Weight0.08 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamic
Drivers1
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsWireless Earbuds, Bluetooth 5.4 HiFi Stereo HeadphonesaptX Adaptive
SurroundSpatial Audio
Noise Control
ANC
ANC TypeEnvironmental Noise Cancellationadaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.45.3
ProfilesA2DP, HFP
Multipoint
Range9.100000381469727 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7.5 hrs6 hrs
Charge Time3 hrs
Fast ChargingType-C fast charging20 Minutes for 2 Hours
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery50 hrs18 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count2
NC Mic
Features
Voice Assistantactivate voice assistantsSiri, Google Assistant
Touch Controls
AppBose app
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX7IPX4

Vor- & Nachteile

Fhumsh i17

  • Strong battery (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong anc (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong connectivity (74th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (72nd percentile)
  • Below average comfort (28th percentile)
  • Below average sound (30th percentile)
  • Below average build (35th percentile)

Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0050

  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong sound (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong mic (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0050

Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 9 of 34 specs.

Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0050 Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness