Anker A3876

Anker A3876

Anker
69 Gesamtbewertung
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
85 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Anker
74
TOZO
79
Gaming
Anker
63
TOZO
79
Travel
Anker
56
TOZO
78
Fitness
Anker
73
TOZO
72
Calls
Anker
57
TOZO
70
Commute
Anker
47
TOZO
70
Music
Anker
49
TOZO
68

Spezifikationen

Anker A3876TOZO Crystal Pods
Design
Form Factoropen-earin-ear
Wearing Styleopen-eartrue wireless
Ear TipsMedium
Weight0.08 kg0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size16 mm10 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance16 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsSoundcore V20i by Anker Open-Ear Headphones, Ultra-Comfort, Snug Fit, Powerful Sound, Clear Calls, IP55, LED Lights, 36H Playtime, Bluetooth 5.4 Earbuds, Multipoint Connection (Renewed)LDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.45.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery36 hrs35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count44
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIP55IPX5

Vor- & Nachteile

Anker A3876

  • Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong mic (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong connectivity (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 85 overall, wins 6 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 35 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommute