HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
96 Gesamtbewertung
vs
MSI CubNADL021

MSI CubNADL021

MSI
30 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
HP
91
MSI
5
Creator
HP
87
MSI
8
Business
HP
87
MSI
28
Developer
HP
87
MSI
16
Home Office
HP
87
MSI
25
Workstation
HP
86
MSI
14
Ai Llm
HP
67
MSI
7
Compact
HP
31
MSI
34

Spezifikationen

HP OMEN GT16-0364MSI CubNADL021
Processor
CPU*AMD Ryzen 7 8700FIntel Celeron
CPU Multi-Core Score
30,931
572
Cores81
Frequency4.1 GHz1.3 GHz
L3 Cache16 MB6 MB
Graphics
GPU*NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070Intel UHD Graphics
GPU Benchmark Score
28,703
1,534
Typediscreteintegrated
VRAM12 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR7Shared
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB4 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR4
Storage 11 TB128 GB
Storage 1 TypeSSDSSD
Build
Form Factormid-towermini
PSU850W65W
Weight14.50 kg0.54 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports21
USB Ports85
Thunderbolt0
HDMI1 x HDMI1x HDMI
DisplayPort3 x DisplayPort1x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 5
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3Bluetooth 5.0
EthernetGigabit Ethernet2x Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Pro

Vor- & Nachteile

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

MSI CubNADL021

  • Below average cpu (0th percentile)0th %ile
  • Below average ram (1st percentile)1st %ile
  • Below average social proof (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average storage (9th percentile)9th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 16 of 26 specs.

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Besser bei:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

MSI CubNADL021 Besser bei:

Compact