GMKtec K12 Black 2025

GMKtec K12 Black 2025

GMKtec
68 Gesamtbewertung
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
96 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
GMKtec
12
HP
91
Creator
GMKtec
22
HP
87
Business
GMKtec
58
HP
87
Developer
GMKtec
64
HP
87
Home Office
GMKtec
67
HP
87
Workstation
GMKtec
51
HP
86
Ai Llm
GMKtec
31
HP
67
Compact
GMKtec
65
HP
31

Spezifikationen

GMKtec K12HP OMEN GT16-0364
Processor
CPU*AMD Ryzen 7 H 255AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
CPU Multi-Core Score
28,678
30,931
Cores88
Frequency4.9 GHz4.1 GHz
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Graphics
GPUAMD Radeon 780MNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GPU Benchmark ScoreKeine Daten
28,703
Typediscrete
VRAM12 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM64 GB32 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR5
Storage 11 TB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeNVMe SSDSSD
Build
Form Factorminimid-tower
PSU120W850W
Weight2.19 kg14.50 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports22
USB Ports48
Thunderbolt0
HDMI1x HDMI 2.11 x HDMI
DisplayPort1x DisplayPort 1.43 x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetooth 5.2Bluetooth 5.3
Ethernet2.5GbEGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 ProWindows 11 Home

Vor- & Nachteile

GMKtec K12 Black 2025

  • Strong ram (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong storage (73rd percentile)
  • Below average gpu (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average reliability (12th percentile)12th %ile

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 8 of 26 specs.

GMKtec K12 Besser bei:

Compact

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Besser bei:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation